Goodbye to our public lands?

February 13th, 2006

President Bush’s budget proposal calls for raising more than $1 billion over five years by selling off public lands deemed to have little scenic, recreational or resource value [...]

In surely one of the most obscene gestures of this Administration, the current budget proposal calls for selling off hundreds of thousands of acres of public land. Oh, and just to make sure that this vast privatization scheme passes the smell test, the money raised will go to… schools. Public land versus schools? Well, shoot!

We always knew that Bush et al were spending so freely so that they could defund social programs in the future. But, boy, a stroke of genius on their part: now, with massive deficits, they can justify vast privatization as a means to raise money.

Bush et al argue that these lands are less than 1% of the total land owned by the public. Hm. That is specious: indeed, if in 1 year they can sell hundreds of thousands of acres, well, in just a few years that “less than 1%” can add up to a significant chunk. After all, this Administration operates in a “foot in the door” fashion… they seek a “temporary” measure, such as tax cuts or the Patriot Act, and then year after year assume it is permanent. It might be less than 1% this year… but just wait till next year.

They also argue that these lands are “isolated” and have little value (note in the above quote that the target lands are deemed to have little “scenic, recreational, or resource value”… no mention of environmental). Let’s dig a little deeper on this one (on the few published maps showing where the sales will occur):

This sale in Oregon’s Ochocho forest demonstrates that the parcels sold are often not “isolated”. Here, we witness a chunk of the forest literally being hacked off. And, again, while the targeted lands above (in red) might not seem like much… just imagine if such sales become the norm for funding schools. How long can these forest withstand year-after-year cuts?

And, remember, some national forests are totally fragemented (due to a legacy of land give-aways in the past). In those cases, the Administration appears to just give away the entire forest.

We can only hope that this blatant privatization scheme fails.

In the coming weeks, as more ways to fight this become available, I will post them here…

Update: How much land will your state lose?

ACTION ALERT: Tell your members of congress to oppose public land sell-off!


Related posts: For sale: forests in the Gorge, Bend, Tahoe..., Land Auction Update, More on Bush privatization of public lands

8 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Chansenco  |  February 19th, 2006 at 8:46 pm

    Terrifying!

  • 2. Land Use Watch » Pu&hellip  |  February 19th, 2006 at 9:39 pm

    [...] Of course, perhaps the distinction between public and private is increasingly not important. After all, public land is being SOLD and privatized by the Federal government. [...]

  • 3. Land Use Watch » Bu&hellip  |  February 19th, 2006 at 10:24 pm

    [...] Republicans’ obscene “foot-in-the-door” to privatize our public lands gets much worse. [...]

  • 4. Land Use Watch » Mo&hellip  |  February 20th, 2006 at 1:39 am

    [...] The Administration insists that their planned fire sale of 300,000 acres is of “isolated” and “valueless” land. [...]

  • 5. Land Use Watch » Po&hellip  |  February 23rd, 2006 at 12:01 pm

    [...] February 22nd, 2006 Background: In an obscene attempt to privatize our public lands, the Bush administration proposes to auction to the highest bidder “isolated” forestland to pay for rural schools. Hundreds of thousands of acres will be chopped out of Bitterroot National Forest, the Columbia Gorge, and many other national treasures. If this scheme is allowed to proceed, year after year, we can expect our public lands to be sold to make up for the Bush-created national deficit. [...]

  • 6. Land Use Watch » La&hellip  |  March 1st, 2006 at 3:32 pm

    [...] March 1st, 2006 Background: In an obscene attempt to privatize our public lands, the Bush administration proposes to auction to the highest bidder “isolated” forestland to pay for rural schools. Hundreds of thousands of acres will be chopped out of Bitterroot National Forest, the Columbia Gorge, and many other national treasures. If this scheme is allowed to proceed, year after year, we can expect our public lands to be sold to make up for the Bush-created national deficit. [...]

  • 7. Land Use Watch » Fo&hellip  |  March 2nd, 2006 at 3:26 pm

    [...] March 2nd, 2006 Background: In an obscene attempt to privatize our public lands, the Bush administration proposes to auction to the highest bidder “isolated” forestland to pay for rural schools. Hundreds of thousands of acres will be chopped out of Bitterroot National Forest, the Columbia Gorge, and many other national treasures. If this scheme is allowed to proceed, year after year, we can expect our public lands to be sold to make up for the Bush-created national deficit. [...]

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Required (to fight spam)

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed



Try Angie's List!


Outdoor Kids Gear


Nitro-Pak Preparedness Center

About Land Use Watch

Commentary and hyperbole on land use issues impacting the NW, the US, the world... Contact at peter (at) landusewatch.com ... Please email postal address to inquire about receiving Land Use Watch in monthly hard-copy periodical format.

Recent Comments

wickerman: “tnr”works? and the numbers of these bastard creatures grow every year? yes, is evil to kill animals, except cats. everyone who kill a cat is a happy man. because cats are like terorists, they kill for the PLEASURE to kill. Let the volunteers to kill stray cats, and keep the domestic cats indoor, else…
-- 5:17 am, September 27, 2008 in Feral cats destroying Iowa

Tara M. Adams: The Donald?!! The Devil!!!!
-- 2:28 pm, September 2, 2008 in Aberdeen, Scotland: Let’s Dump Trump

micheelgeorge: When Plum Creek Timber Company bought 900,000 acres – 1,400 square miles – of Maine woods in 1998, it bought more than trees. It bought mountains along the Appalachian Trail, tens of wild trout ponds, miles of land flanking the Kennebec and Moose rivers and over 60 miles of shoreline along Moosehead Lake. ————&# 8211; micheel Utah Drug Addiction
-- 7:38 am, August 25, 2008 in Plum Creek Timber Company versus Moosehead Maine?

Kitty Clasing: I am looking for the closest trap, neuter and release program in Mason City, Iowa-50401
-- 8:45 am, August 5, 2008 in Trap, neuter, release and the Iowa cats

Stephanie: The argument that killing all cats to stop predatory behaviour on native creatures should then justify the killing of native predators is pure crap. The native animals are part of the natural cycle; cats are introduced by people. Like blackberries, and scotch bloom and English ivy, and starlings they are an invasive species that are driving out natives. Feeding and promoting feral cat populations should be a crime. They carry diseases like roundworm, heartworm, and hookworm, various forms of FIV and feline leukemia, distemper, and all manner of other sicknesses that cost responsible pet owners thousands of dollars to treat...
-- 2:59 pm, June 20, 2008 in Free James Stevenson

Lucas Stahl: Being an american citizen and knowing Donald Trumps past, the public of Aberdeen have to make it their scottish duty to keep Trump away from their lands. He has a way of taking everything from you and giving little in return. Your town will become the \”Las Vegas\” of Scotland with thousands of disrespectful tourists deficating over your lands and family. I know you think it will create jobs for your town and boost the economy but there are other means to do this; not through an ignorant; greed riddled man who makes a habit of stomping his feet, throwing out his chest and holding his...
-- 10:07 am, June 11, 2008 in Aberdeen, Scotland: Let’s Dump Trump

victoria davidson: I am a first generation American whos family are from the UK. I strongly disagree with the “Trump” philosophy in America. Mr. Trump’s buliding along the Chicago River is an architectural monstroisity. Yet it is wrong to assume all Americans are “narcissictic & greedy”. One of the reasons I love my UK visits is because of the timeless natural beauty along the coastlines not tainted with resorts and casinos. I applaud your efforts to block the building of this environmental disaster and hope you succeed. Perhaps Mr. Trump can find another venu to honour his...
-- 10:07 am, June 11, 2008 in Aberdeen, Scotland: Let’s Dump Trump

Antoinette Harrington: I am an American, sick to death of “the donald” and his belief that his wealth entitles him to buy and destroy any piece of land on the globe. My dislike for him is indeed emotional, having seen how he destroyed the beauty of the Chicago River landscape with his Trump monstrosity. I hope and pray you will continue fighting till the last to prevent this man from achieving his goal. He will claim his plan is environmentally sound, and his witnesses will agree (though knowing the political climate, their agreement carries a price tag). Unlike Trump, I cannot afford to enjoy the...
-- 11:02 am, June 10, 2008 in Aberdeen, Scotland: Let’s Dump Trump

jj: Um, yeah, Most of that is BS. Get your facts right. Biofuels release carbon emissions, yes, but in carbon DIOXIDE. That’s what the plants eat. It doesn’t matter how much fuel the plant makes from sunlight, because we are fermenting it anyways. Soybean oil and biodiesel contain no sulfur and generate no sulfur emissions, a major source of acidification in rain and surface water. This makes biodiesel the best technology currently available for heavy-duty diesel applications to reduce atmospheric carbon. So basically, the best we have for right now. Oh, yeah, and about the hunger stuff, I have a solution: DON”T USE...
-- 10:12 am, June 9, 2008 in Biofuels = stupid idea

Muscle Guitar: I agree with the author.Don’t report a feral cat colony to a humane society or rescue group.I have a neighbor who feeds feral cats and they became a real problem.They don’t act like house cats.They are constantly stalking prey like birds,squirrels and small rabbits.The tom cats are relentless sprayers. I mentioned this to my neighbor,and she acted as if it were none of my business that the cats were damaging my property. Better to report the colony to Animal Control,then if the cats are coming on your property let them trap them.Find a discreet place where the neighbors can’t see the...
-- 7:48 pm, June 8, 2008 in Feral cats = huge environmental problem!

Emma: NO ONE SHOULD KILL ANIMALS! EVEN FERAL CATS! IT’S EVIL! I know I it might be “killing widlife” and “spreading disease”, but NO ONE should kill kitties!
-- 10:10 am, June 3, 2008 in Feral cats destroying Iowa

Louie: I’m from Hong Kong, China. Just read the newspaper (it’s in Chinese) that the breeding program has begun. What’s more? There’re two male specimens left in Vietnam. Don’t know if they’ll transport these two males to China and let them breed with the only female. If it happens, it’s a good news that it could extend the diversity of this species’ gene pool.
-- 7:24 pm, June 1, 2008 in Two Yangtze giant soft-shell turtles left… will China do anything?

Saki: Do the math. Either way, killing a cat or neutering a cat means one less cat that can reproduce, meaning the feral population will go down and eventually die out. The big question is do you want to behave like a psychopath in the making and kill innocent cats, or do you want to show that you really are smarter than other animals and get the cats neutered so they can live out the rest of their lives naturally? Before you answer that question, THINK; don\’t just react. Rednecks can be smart too. Proove that you\’re not a stereotype.
-- 8:39 pm, May 28, 2008 in Feral cats = huge environmental problem!

dhtuisgjkzdfghjksd: the lng is gay
-- 11:01 am, May 28, 2008 in LNG and the Columbia: bad news

dallas: that is totaly right. i have to tright a paper on them and this cite rocks.
-- 12:57 pm, May 27, 2008 in Ocelots in Texas!?

Tag Cloud

measure 49 oregon measure 37 pessimism oregonians in action endangered species washington private property I 933 optimism media california elections 1000 friends sprawl feral cats consumerism rivers logging land auction china LNG portland parks energy england gorge florida africa proposition 90 gop canada wetlands transportation stupid religion politicians ocean india farms towns texas scotland nonprofits nevada missouri metro maine louisiana japan Idaho iceland gordon smith forests fish colorado climate brazil australia amazon wyoming utah salmon ross day Proposition 207 population pollution osu new york military measure 48 maryland kansas ireland invasive species hunting guyana georgia france Ecuador economics desert cuba connecticut community chile cambodia burma borneo big look Arizona alaska alabama

Posts by Date

February 2006
M T W T F S S
« Jan   Mar »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728  

Posts by Month

  • Blogroll

  • Land Use Advocacy

  • Tools

  • Feeds