STOP THE LNG PIPELINES


Bush wants to privatize Columbia Gorge forestland…

February 19th, 2006

The Administration’s obscene “foot-in-the-door” to privatize our public lands gets much worse.

Perhaps you believed the Administration’s claim that the 300,000+ acres of public land slated for sale are “worthless”? Wrong.

From Friends of the Columbia Gorge:

The US Forest Service is proposing to put 300,000 acres of what they call “disposable public lands” out to the highest bidder, including 730 acres in the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area. […]

Properties on both sides of the Columbia Gorge are named on the potential sale list. These include lands in Corbett, above Sheppard’s Dell and near Cascade Locks in Oregon. On the Washington side, land near Cape Horn, Wind Mountain and above the flooded Celilo Falls would be available to the highest bidder.

The Columbia Gorge is one of the crown jewels of the Pacific Northwest. (Even Reagan apparently recognized this, as it was in 1986 that the Gorge was named as the first National Scenic Areas.) And, bizarrely, even someone in THIS Administration seems to recognize its worth:

Ironically, the President’s 2007 budget also calls for $1 million for further land acquisition in the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area.

This entire privatization scheme needs to be halted. It’s not just the Columbia Gorge… it is hundreds of similarly valuable places. Just because land appears to be “fragmented” on a topo-map, it often isn’t when you look at a satellite view. And even isolated land can serve as a core for new conservation efforts in the future.

This scheme is simply a way to set precedent for future budgets… if they can sell off chunks of the Gorge now, just imagine what they might sell next year, or in 10 years.

While everyone should take action and ask the Regional Forester to remove Columbia Gorge lands from the auction targets, it seems to me that the Gorge could be a potent symbol for the entire 300,000 acres. If vital forestland in the Gorge is on the auction block, well, just imagine what else might be included?

For those who don’t know what the Columbia Gorge is, consider that this impacts just about every State. And, just like the Gorge, other valuable land is included in the list to sell:

In North Carolina:

Forest Service maps show several tracts adjacent to the Needmore land in Swain County could be sold. The state owns 4,400 acres in the area and manages the land as game lands.

The Needmore tracts were bought in 2004 after a major public-private campaign to preserve the property. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service put up $2 million toward the purchase.

Hm. So this worthless land that is to be auctioned off also includes land that was previously purchased for conservation?

If the U.S. Forest Service begins selling off public lands, the agency won’t have any trouble finding buyers for land in Western North Carolina.

“I know there would be massive interest in larger tracts due to the fact there aren’t any large tracts of land left in Macon County,” said Robin Parker, owner of Cat Creek Realty in Franklin.

That’s right. Large tracts of open space are a rarity in more and more of the country. Their “value” is precisely because they are undeveloped, and they should be kept as such.

In Colorado:

The U.S. Forest Service has listed scenic land overlooking Rocky Mountain National Park and land around St. Mary’s Glacier as sites that could be sold to raise money for rural schools in 41 states.

In Missouri:

The Missouri land that might be sold is part of a once-depleted forest that public financing and decades of management have nurtured back to health.

Yes, after the public has paid for its reforestation, it’s time to sell!

Cedar Creek District Forester Carol Trokey said the land was mostly wooded, but some parcels have old fields with cedar trees. She said the parcels would be most useful for recreation or hunting.

Wait? The land would be useful for recreation or hunting? I thought that there was no recreation value in these lands?

And even some of the most anti-environment GOPers seem to be coming out against this proposal:

“Public lands are an asset that needs to be managed and conserved,” said Sen. Larry Craig of Idaho.

I can’t believe I am saying it, but Larry Craig is right (at least about the conservation part).

UPDATE: ACTION ALERT. Takes 1 minute. Please take action by emailing the regional forester and, more importantly, your congressional delegation.

UPDATE 2: DONATE ALERT. Please take action above. But also consider making even a small contribution to the organizations that are fighting this battle. Sadly, the environment receives a fraction of total philanthropic donations. Please consider donating to Friends of the Columbia Gorge and, for the larger battle, to The Wilderness Society.


Related posts: Damascus voters ruin Damascus, Goodbye to the Adirondacks (and other forests), Christianity versus land use planning

8 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Gordie  |  February 21st, 2006 at 4:55 am

    Regarding your rallying cry, note that the administration figures it can make the money necessary to provide the county and O&C payments by disposing of just under 200,000 acres of the 300,000 acres that have been proposed for sale. If that’s the case, the Columbia River Gorge Land could easily be cut from the proposal…though I’d wager they’ll wait until folks had wasted lots of energy and attention on the high-profile areas, making it easier to sell the more rural lands.

    FYI, when it comes to forest purchases, the National Forest system has been growing by about 100,000 acres per year for the last several years via purchases and land swaps. Would they put $1 million in the budget for Gorge land purchases if they thought there was a reasonable chance of selling those nominated parcels?

  • 2. Jenni Simonis  |  February 21st, 2006 at 6:29 am

    I wrote up an item on this on Feb 11th when the announcement was made– I loved Oregon’s natural areas when I visited in ‘97 and ‘98 and they’re a big reason why I agreed to move here in the summer of 2000.

    I went through the listing from the federal government and ranked the states according to the amount of land to be sold– Oregon came out #8 at 10,581 acres. More than 90 acres of land in the Columbia River Gorge on Oregon’s side is proposed for sale, almost 640 acres of land in the Columbia River Gorge on Washington’s side, and more than 376 acres on Mt. Hood.

    We absolutely have to stop this.

    http://www.blogfororegon.com/2006/02/bush_administration_wants_to_sell_public_lands

  • 3. Shantu Shah  |  February 21st, 2006 at 9:31 pm

    What are our elected representatives doing to stop this land sale of Columbia Gorge National Scenic area? If the curernt representatives in congress do not give any guarrantee to stop this sale do not vote for them in primary.

    I as a progressive democratic candidate for the Representative in US Congress from Oregon First District, when elected will make it my top priority to reverse this sale if that happens before the general election. I guarrantee it. Friends of the Columbia Gorge are my friends since Gorge (nature) is like my God.

  • 4. Peter Bray  |  February 22nd, 2006 at 1:17 am

    Gordie: Proof that the FS has been growing by 100,000 per year? So says Rey. But most land swaps are pretty blatantly phony.

  • 5. Land Use Watch » Po&hellip  |  February 23rd, 2006 at 12:00 pm

    […] February 22nd, 2006 Background: In an obscene attempt to privatize our public lands, the Bush administration proposes to auction to the highest bidder “isolated” forestland to pay for rural schools. Hundreds of thousands of acres will be chopped out of Bitterroot National Forest, the Columbia Gorge, and many other national treasures. If this scheme is allowed to proceed, year after year, we can expect our public lands to be sold to make up for the Bush-created national deficit. […]

  • 6. Land Use Watch » La&hellip  |  March 1st, 2006 at 3:34 pm

    […] March 1st, 2006 Background: In an obscene attempt to privatize our public lands, the Bush administration proposes to auction to the highest bidder “isolated” forestland to pay for rural schools. Hundreds of thousands of acres will be chopped out of Bitterroot National Forest, the Columbia Gorge, and many other national treasures. If this scheme is allowed to proceed, year after year, we can expect our public lands to be sold to make up for the Bush-created national deficit. […]

  • 7. Land Use Watch » Fo&hellip  |  March 2nd, 2006 at 3:27 pm

    […] March 2nd, 2006 Background: In an obscene attempt to privatize our public lands, the Bush administration proposes to auction to the highest bidder “isolated” forestland to pay for rural schools. Hundreds of thousands of acres will be chopped out of Bitterroot National Forest, the Columbia Gorge, and many other national treasures. If this scheme is allowed to proceed, year after year, we can expect our public lands to be sold to make up for the Bush-created national deficit. […]

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Required (to fight spam)

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Commentary and hyperbole on land use issues impacting the NW, the US, the world... Contact at peter (at) landusewatch.com ... Please email postal address to inquire about receiving Land Use Watch in monthly hard-copy periodical format.

Recent Comments

Laz: While I understand the need to protect endangered bird species, is it not cruel to confine an outdoor cat to the indoors? A human would not enjoy not being able to leave their house for their entire life. Furthermore, I think that shooting the cat was not the right direction to take. Shooting a cat will not solve the problem, but instead we should try to spay/neuter these cats (not an immediate solution, but an investment in the future, surely) or outfitting the cats with some sort of bell collar. And it isn't like birds are never problems either. Sparrows and starlings have plagued my bird feeders for years, and often chase away my...
-- 7:31 am, May 7, 2008 in Free James Stevenson

big daddy bass!: Sorry, but if you justify feral cats as being positive, you are an idiot. Connect the dots. It is a hang up you must get over. They are invasive, abnormal to the new world. Sorry. I know that hurts a lot of otherwise good people. Keep your cats indoors. They are your responsibility. Not your neighbors.
-- 8:05 pm, May 4, 2008 in Free James Stevenson

Marcia Denison: Timber theft occurs regularly from Oregon State Forests. The timber may be paid for, but not taxes on unmarked logs illegally exported or transported to out of state mills. Stumpage is stolen from counties, work from Oregon Mills, our watersherds and wildlife habitat desroyed with nothing to show for it literally.
-- 11:17 pm, May 3, 2008 in Interesting environmental stories...

WarKitten: So you demand "scientific evidence" that TNR effectively reduces cat populations more effectively and trap and kill... but we are supposed to rely on your intuitive feelings to the contrary? Gee... that's convincing.
-- 1:36 pm, April 24, 2008 in A plague of feral cats

Brian: Yes! Biofuels are really stupid. The most efficient green plants convert about 0.1% of the solar power that falls on them to fuel. Plus we are about to see WW3 start because converting food to biofuels is causing millions to starve to death... We need to cover the state of Arizona with solar energy farms that convert 30% of the sun\'s energy to power. Use that power to make electricity, hydrogen, etc. Divert natural gas from power plants and use it to run cars and buses. The amount of solar energy that hits the Earth is about 175 petawatts. That\'s 100,000 times the total energy that humans use. If we could capture 1/2% of...
-- 8:36 pm, April 23, 2008 in Biofuels = stupid idea

Peter: Euthanizing doesn’t make feral cat populations go down. When a feral cat is destroyed, another feral cat will eventually take its place, and still kittens are being born. Feral cat enthusiasts love to use this logic. But it simply doesn't make sense. Does the new feral that takes the place of the euthanized feral simply materialize out of thin air? Of course not. The net result is that there are fewer cats when they are euthanized, even if new cats move into the old cats range (though there is no scientific evidence that feral cat colonies somehow keep other feral cats at bay).
-- 9:30 pm, April 22, 2008 in ALL feral cats must be humanely euthanized (or kept indoors)

Alex the Feral Cat Activist ("Alex" above): Whoops typo! At the end I meant to say series... my bad!
-- 7:10 pm, April 22, 2008 in ALL feral cats must be humanely euthanized (or kept indoors)

Alex: Feral cats only harm populations in tiny, isolated habitats, because they are so fragile. TNR is the way to go! Also, many cats probably won't need to be on leashes if they are spayed or neutered. Please spay or neuter your pets, please! Euthanizing doesn't make feral cat populations go down. When a feral cat is destroyed, another feral cat will eventually take its place, and still kittens are being born. TNR really does work. Trap - the feral cat is humanely trapped and sent to a trustworthy nimal shelter that does spaying or neutering for feral cats. Neuter - The cat is cleaned up,...
-- 7:07 pm, April 22, 2008 in ALL feral cats must be humanely euthanized (or kept indoors)

Alex: This article deserves to go and shrivel up in a pit. The Wisconsin Study has been proven wrong and feral cats hardly affect local bird and squirrel populations. See Alley Cat Allies at www.alleycat.org for more information on feral cats.
-- 6:45 pm, April 22, 2008 in ALL feral cats must be humanely euthanized (or kept indoors)

john: Kari, Why are you so damn quick to lay our body down in David Bragdon's defense, when Bragdon himself has seen no need at all to explain his sellout to OIA. Maybe you have become a radical right-winger. At the very least. I serious question your judgment in picking forked-tongued politicos and wiping their websites for them.
-- 5:36 pm, April 17, 2008 in David Bragdon HEARTS Oregonians In Action?

alice thompson: Hey Peter, Unscientifically speaking, I'm guessing you do not have or have never had a cat as a pet. The hate in your words gives me chills. I, on the other hand, love cats; I'm a caretaker, and a little better at it then some of your descriptions suggest. And occasionally one of these feral cats does kill a bird, and I hate when it happens just like I hate seeing Bambi's mother killed by a great white hunter who places a salt lick on his property to attract them. I can also tell you that a far greater predator to flying wildlife are the office buildings with reflective, mirror type windows. I work in one and there is...
-- 9:19 am, April 16, 2008 in A plague of feral cats

John: I do think that it's far fetched. Sorry to be so rude, but it's the case. Don't think that I don't know abt hinduism, I have hindu friends. But the gods you pray...so many of them. Some have knives, snakes etc around them...look so ev** It's just a mythology, you need to evolve !!! ;)
-- 11:25 am, April 15, 2008 in Does God exist? The Indian Government says "No"

Amanda: A little late in the comments I see. But I felt the need to contribute. I am 8 weeks away from graduating with a BS in Civil Engineering with a concentration in water resources and I can vouch for how poor most bottled water is. Smart Water tested one place out of many, and of course they report only one, they want more people to buy their products. Most bottled water is tap water. For all of you living in imagination land, check their sites. Most bottles or websites say "FPS" meaning from public source. The regulations a chemical limits on tap water are much more harsh and regulated then some...
-- 12:28 am, April 15, 2008 in Glaceau "Smartwater" and the war on water

Jake Prisby: Just FYI...DevonWood Equestrian Centre is one of the top equestrian facilities in the world. Also, Justin Rattner is Intel's current Chief Technology Officer and Vice President. He is also a Senior Intel Fellow and has been with the company for nearly 35 years.
-- 11:33 pm, April 12, 2008 in Measure 49 and property rights

Gabriel: hm... this is an interesting story, and I first want to thank you for giving the information I can use very actively. It is very depressing that only two of this specie is left and also that Chinese government is not giving in the money for saving this specie. I started to live in China few years ago, so I know what kind of Environment these species would be in. You can believe in government, but never can with the time. I just hope this specie will be alive until the project of breeding is done...
-- 5:48 pm, April 11, 2008 in Two Yangtze giant soft-shell turtles left... will China do anything?

Tag Cloud

measure 49 oregon measure 37 pessimism oregonians in action endangered species washington private property I 933 optimism media california elections 1000 friends sprawl feral cats consumerism rivers logging land auction china LNG portland parks energy england gorge florida africa proposition 90 gop canada wetlands transportation stupid religion politicians ocean india farms towns texas scotland nonprofits nevada missouri metro maine louisiana japan Idaho iceland gordon smith forests fish colorado climate brazil australia amazon wyoming utah salmon ross day Proposition 207 population pollution osu new york military measure 48 maryland kansas ireland invasive species hunting guyana georgia france Ecuador economics desert cuba connecticut community chile cambodia burma borneo big look Arizona alaska alabama

Posts by Date

February 2006
M T W T F S S
« Jan   Mar »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728  

Posts by Month

Blogroll

Land Use Advocacy

Tools

Feeds