Bush wants to privatize Columbia Gorge forestland…

February 19th, 2006

The Administration’s obscene “foot-in-the-door” to privatize our public lands gets much worse.

Perhaps you believed the Administration’s claim that the 300,000+ acres of public land slated for sale are “worthless”? Wrong.

From Friends of the Columbia Gorge:

The US Forest Service is proposing to put 300,000 acres of what they call “disposable public lands” out to the highest bidder, including 730 acres in the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area. [...]

Properties on both sides of the Columbia Gorge are named on the potential sale list. These include lands in Corbett, above Sheppard’s Dell and near Cascade Locks in Oregon. On the Washington side, land near Cape Horn, Wind Mountain and above the flooded Celilo Falls would be available to the highest bidder.

The Columbia Gorge is one of the crown jewels of the Pacific Northwest. (Even Reagan apparently recognized this, as it was in 1986 that the Gorge was named as the first National Scenic Areas.) And, bizarrely, even someone in THIS Administration seems to recognize its worth:

Ironically, the President’s 2007 budget also calls for $1 million for further land acquisition in the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area.

This entire privatization scheme needs to be halted. It’s not just the Columbia Gorge… it is hundreds of similarly valuable places. Just because land appears to be “fragmented” on a topo-map, it often isn’t when you look at a satellite view. And even isolated land can serve as a core for new conservation efforts in the future.

This scheme is simply a way to set precedent for future budgets… if they can sell off chunks of the Gorge now, just imagine what they might sell next year, or in 10 years.

While everyone should take action and ask the Regional Forester to remove Columbia Gorge lands from the auction targets, it seems to me that the Gorge could be a potent symbol for the entire 300,000 acres. If vital forestland in the Gorge is on the auction block, well, just imagine what else might be included?

For those who don’t know what the Columbia Gorge is, consider that this impacts just about every State. And, just like the Gorge, other valuable land is included in the list to sell:

In North Carolina:

Forest Service maps show several tracts adjacent to the Needmore land in Swain County could be sold. The state owns 4,400 acres in the area and manages the land as game lands.

The Needmore tracts were bought in 2004 after a major public-private campaign to preserve the property. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service put up $2 million toward the purchase.

Hm. So this worthless land that is to be auctioned off also includes land that was previously purchased for conservation?

If the U.S. Forest Service begins selling off public lands, the agency won’t have any trouble finding buyers for land in Western North Carolina.

“I know there would be massive interest in larger tracts due to the fact there aren’t any large tracts of land left in Macon County,” said Robin Parker, owner of Cat Creek Realty in Franklin.

That’s right. Large tracts of open space are a rarity in more and more of the country. Their “value” is precisely because they are undeveloped, and they should be kept as such.

In Colorado:

The U.S. Forest Service has listed scenic land overlooking Rocky Mountain National Park and land around St. Mary’s Glacier as sites that could be sold to raise money for rural schools in 41 states.

In Missouri:

The Missouri land that might be sold is part of a once-depleted forest that public financing and decades of management have nurtured back to health.

Yes, after the public has paid for its reforestation, it’s time to sell!

Cedar Creek District Forester Carol Trokey said the land was mostly wooded, but some parcels have old fields with cedar trees. She said the parcels would be most useful for recreation or hunting.

Wait? The land would be useful for recreation or hunting? I thought that there was no recreation value in these lands?

And even some of the most anti-environment GOPers seem to be coming out against this proposal:

“Public lands are an asset that needs to be managed and conserved,” said Sen. Larry Craig of Idaho.

I can’t believe I am saying it, but Larry Craig is right (at least about the conservation part).

UPDATE: ACTION ALERT. Takes 1 minute. Please take action by emailing the regional forester and, more importantly, your congressional delegation.

UPDATE 2: DONATE ALERT. Please take action above. But also consider making even a small contribution to the organizations that are fighting this battle. Sadly, the environment receives a fraction of total philanthropic donations. Please consider donating to Friends of the Columbia Gorge and, for the larger battle, to The Wilderness Society.


8 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Gordie  |  February 21st, 2006 at 4:55 am

    Regarding your rallying cry, note that the administration figures it can make the money necessary to provide the county and O&C payments by disposing of just under 200,000 acres of the 300,000 acres that have been proposed for sale. If that’s the case, the Columbia River Gorge Land could easily be cut from the proposal…though I’d wager they’ll wait until folks had wasted lots of energy and attention on the high-profile areas, making it easier to sell the more rural lands.

    FYI, when it comes to forest purchases, the National Forest system has been growing by about 100,000 acres per year for the last several years via purchases and land swaps. Would they put $1 million in the budget for Gorge land purchases if they thought there was a reasonable chance of selling those nominated parcels?

  • 2. Jenni Simonis  |  February 21st, 2006 at 6:29 am

    I wrote up an item on this on Feb 11th when the announcement was made– I loved Oregon’s natural areas when I visited in ‘97 and ‘98 and they’re a big reason why I agreed to move here in the summer of 2000.

    I went through the listing from the federal government and ranked the states according to the amount of land to be sold– Oregon came out #8 at 10,581 acres. More than 90 acres of land in the Columbia River Gorge on Oregon’s side is proposed for sale, almost 640 acres of land in the Columbia River Gorge on Washington’s side, and more than 376 acres on Mt. Hood.

    We absolutely have to stop this.

    http://www.blogfororegon.com/2006/02/bush_administration_wants_to_sell_public_lands

  • 3. Shantu Shah  |  February 21st, 2006 at 9:31 pm

    What are our elected representatives doing to stop this land sale of Columbia Gorge National Scenic area? If the curernt representatives in congress do not give any guarrantee to stop this sale do not vote for them in primary.

    I as a progressive democratic candidate for the Representative in US Congress from Oregon First District, when elected will make it my top priority to reverse this sale if that happens before the general election. I guarrantee it. Friends of the Columbia Gorge are my friends since Gorge (nature) is like my God.

  • 4. Peter Bray  |  February 22nd, 2006 at 1:17 am

    Gordie: Proof that the FS has been growing by 100,000 per year? So says Rey. But most land swaps are pretty blatantly phony.

  • 5. Land Use Watch » Po&hellip  |  February 23rd, 2006 at 12:00 pm

    [...] February 22nd, 2006 Background: In an obscene attempt to privatize our public lands, the Bush administration proposes to auction to the highest bidder “isolated” forestland to pay for rural schools. Hundreds of thousands of acres will be chopped out of Bitterroot National Forest, the Columbia Gorge, and many other national treasures. If this scheme is allowed to proceed, year after year, we can expect our public lands to be sold to make up for the Bush-created national deficit. [...]

  • 6. Land Use Watch » La&hellip  |  March 1st, 2006 at 3:34 pm

    [...] March 1st, 2006 Background: In an obscene attempt to privatize our public lands, the Bush administration proposes to auction to the highest bidder “isolated” forestland to pay for rural schools. Hundreds of thousands of acres will be chopped out of Bitterroot National Forest, the Columbia Gorge, and many other national treasures. If this scheme is allowed to proceed, year after year, we can expect our public lands to be sold to make up for the Bush-created national deficit. [...]

  • 7. Land Use Watch » Fo&hellip  |  March 2nd, 2006 at 3:27 pm

    [...] March 2nd, 2006 Background: In an obscene attempt to privatize our public lands, the Bush administration proposes to auction to the highest bidder “isolated” forestland to pay for rural schools. Hundreds of thousands of acres will be chopped out of Bitterroot National Forest, the Columbia Gorge, and many other national treasures. If this scheme is allowed to proceed, year after year, we can expect our public lands to be sold to make up for the Bush-created national deficit. [...]

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Required (to fight spam)

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed



Try Angie's List!


Outdoor Kids Gear


Nitro-Pak Preparedness Center

About Land Use Watch

Commentary and hyperbole on land use issues impacting the NW, the US, the world... Contact at peter (at) landusewatch.com ... Please email postal address to inquire about receiving Land Use Watch in monthly hard-copy periodical format.

Recent Comments

DE: “From my point of view, they are the antichrist of the world.” —Ken Salazar, to a Colorado Springs television station in April 2006, about James Dobson’s Focus on the Family group. He later said, “I regret having used that term. I meant to say this approach was un-Christian, meaning self-serving and selfish.”
-- 1:08 pm, December 22, 2008 in Obama (and the Sierra Club) sucks, part 3

DE: “Earned a perfect-100 ranking in 2008 from the League of Conservation Voters, a nonpartisan organization that tracks environmental-voting records in Congress. His lifetime LCV score is an 81.” A 100 ranking from LCV. This is a massive improvement over Bush’s henchmen. You’ll never be happy.
-- 1:07 pm, December 22, 2008 in Obama just doesn’t get it

DE: This blog has become a depressing place to hang out. I enjoyed your coverage of M37-49, but it’s just angry hackery now. Maybe it will be more fun when Nader is elected in 2012 and you can celebrate his excellent appointments, but for now… Unsubscribed.
-- 1:03 pm, December 22, 2008 in Obama (and the Sierra Club) sucks, part 3

Zarathustra: Fremont County Veterinary Clinic in Sidney (the closest vet,) falsely identified as the clinic who would euthanize cats, issued a statement that they would in fact spay/neuter cats for Trap-Neuter-Return in an agreement with Fry‘s Country Bargains, a no-kill shelter in Creston. There are a lot in NE, if you want to go that far. Locally, beware of OHSU. They play loose with the regs and are not above paying people to round up cats, claim cats and dogs at the pound, etc., where they end up in OHSU labs. Hard to believe it can be hard to get that message out, here. I was shocked that saying that there...
-- 8:06 pm, December 18, 2008 in Trap, neuter, release and the Iowa cats

Zarathustra: Like it’s accidental? He gets it; it’s the Dems that voted for him that don’t get it! This was the wost from a third party POV in years.
-- 7:54 pm, December 18, 2008 in Obama just doesn’t get it

Zarathustra: Tomorrow’s my b-day. Hope it’s my last. No change; no hope! Hmmm, maybe a cunning plan to deal with health insurance; people not giving a damn if they live or die. Well, something to hope for. Bill Clinton doubled the Federal non-violent prison population. I’m predicting that BO will stink in the same way, only worse. Dems are suckers for that action and I stand to clean up when it does happen. Like I care about money. Yeah, back to no hope. Which is worse, to run as the face of evil and fulfill it, or run as hope and change and give us more of the same? I much prefer an open...
-- 7:51 pm, December 18, 2008 in Obama (and the Sierra Club) sucks, part 3

R: ***COMPLETELY OFF TOPIC*** Glad to see you’re back from your hiatus. I came to this site to post an obligatory comment about cats and birds, as my indoor cat is obsessed with birds this morning, but will refrain since you’ve posted new stuff. Keep fighting the good fight! :)
-- 9:10 am, December 15, 2008 in Raul Grijalva for Interior! (NO to Mike Thompson!)

johanna lynch: Mike Thompson is a bad joke here in Northern California. He is a good ‘ole wine boy! Anti-environmentalist and would be disastrous as Secretary of the Interior. Thompson would be as bad as it gets under the Reagan administration re environmental issues. Forestry, land use and wildlife would be brutalized. This man is a “trophy hunter” the worst kind of idiot-recreational hunters. An embarrassment for the US and a disgraceful example of disdain for nature, wildlife and diminishing natural resources
-- 10:24 am, December 14, 2008 in Raul Grijalva for Interior! (NO to Mike Thompson!)

SANDMAN: I don’t know, but when the Bush administration murdered 68,000 salmon on the lower Klamath river Thompson dumped 500 lbs of dead fish on the steps of BOR’s DC office building and demanded change. Last week parties announced an agreement in principle to remove the lower four Klamath dams - this would be the largest river resotration event in World History. Not bad pro-environmental credential if you ask me.
-- 12:06 pm, December 12, 2008 in Mike Thompson: Elephant hunter?

Peter: I’ve been through every vote he has made since 1991. When he votes for Bush’s “Healthy Forests Initiative”, against fish/widlife funding, against roadless areas in Tongass… and many times when he did such votes he was the ONLY California Democrat to do so (or one of only 30 Dems total to do so)… I can only conclude that he is anti-environment. Carl Pope might very well favor him versus a GOPer in that seat. Mike Thompson is a BAD choice for Interior. He hasn’t been a leader for the environment, save for dumping some fish and sponsoring a bill… he has simply...
-- 12:56 pm, December 11, 2008 in Is Klamath Riverkeeper anti-environment?

ed hochuli: You need to take it easy with the hyperventilating…” Bush-lite?” The guy won the Sierra Club’s Edgar Wayburn award last year. I went to a fundraiser of his in Santa Rosa and Carl Pope was there praising him over and over. Ask environmental groups in his district like klamath riverkeeper how he is on the environment. Anyone can pick through a few votes. Do your homework.
-- 10:43 am, December 11, 2008 in Is Klamath Riverkeeper anti-environment?

Peter: Thompson is hardly progressive. He is, after all, a member of the conservative Blue Dog democrats. And I’m not sure how many progressives get awards, such as Legislator of the Year, from pro-hunting outfits like Safari Club International (whose members hunt lions, rhinos, elephants, etc).
-- 7:24 pm, December 8, 2008 in Mike Thompson is anti-environment

John Mccarthy: Look, what were doing here is just having a useless argument between two well-suited democrats who would both do well in this position. I happen to know Mike personally, I happen to know that he just received an award this week from the Sierra Club because of his conservation efforts. Also, I don’t feel it necessary to instigate a battle with someone who does not think Obama is “progressive” enough, or someone who did not support Obama. Actually do some research, go on Thompson’s site, and you’ll find your results. And hey, I support Mike, but you support Grijalva, and power...
-- 6:47 pm, December 8, 2008 in Mike Thompson is anti-environment

Peter: You “could” do it? Well, go ahead and do so. If you don’t, then it is hardly evidence. Look at Thompson’s record. He is bought and owned by hunting interests and will do their bidding every time. Limits on roadless areas? Voted against it. Bush’s anti-environment policies, such as Healthy Forests? Supported them. Thompson may very well win. And that’s one of the main reasons I never supported Barack Obama. He is not a progressive.
-- 6:34 pm, December 8, 2008 in Mike Thompson is anti-environment

John Mccarthy: Mike Thompson happens to be a competent, capable person that I, and many others support to be Secretary of Interior. He has a long history of preserving the environment, which you have obviously failed to mention. Peter, I could do a long anti-environment blog against Grijalva, because I’m sure I could nitpick at all the bills he’s vetoed and passed, but I, unlike you, have better things to do with my time, as well as an actual sense of politics. There’s also a reason Obama has Thompson as the frontrunner, and not Grijalva. When Thompson is picked, I will be laughing at you and your...
-- 6:28 pm, December 8, 2008 in Mike Thompson is anti-environment

Posts by Date

February 2006
M T W T F S S
« Jan   Mar »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728  

Posts by Month

  • Blogroll

  • Land Use Advocacy

  • Tools

  • Feeds