Bush wants to privatize Columbia Gorge forestland…

February 19th, 2006

The Administration’s obscene “foot-in-the-door” to privatize our public lands gets much worse.

Perhaps you believed the Administration’s claim that the 300,000+ acres of public land slated for sale are “worthless”? Wrong.

From Friends of the Columbia Gorge:

The US Forest Service is proposing to put 300,000 acres of what they call “disposable public lands” out to the highest bidder, including 730 acres in the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area. […]

Properties on both sides of the Columbia Gorge are named on the potential sale list. These include lands in Corbett, above Sheppard’s Dell and near Cascade Locks in Oregon. On the Washington side, land near Cape Horn, Wind Mountain and above the flooded Celilo Falls would be available to the highest bidder.

The Columbia Gorge is one of the crown jewels of the Pacific Northwest. (Even Reagan apparently recognized this, as it was in 1986 that the Gorge was named as the first National Scenic Areas.) And, bizarrely, even someone in THIS Administration seems to recognize its worth:

Ironically, the President’s 2007 budget also calls for $1 million for further land acquisition in the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area.

This entire privatization scheme needs to be halted. It’s not just the Columbia Gorge… it is hundreds of similarly valuable places. Just because land appears to be “fragmented” on a topo-map, it often isn’t when you look at a satellite view. And even isolated land can serve as a core for new conservation efforts in the future.

This scheme is simply a way to set precedent for future budgets… if they can sell off chunks of the Gorge now, just imagine what they might sell next year, or in 10 years.

While everyone should take action and ask the Regional Forester to remove Columbia Gorge lands from the auction targets, it seems to me that the Gorge could be a potent symbol for the entire 300,000 acres. If vital forestland in the Gorge is on the auction block, well, just imagine what else might be included?

For those who don’t know what the Columbia Gorge is, consider that this impacts just about every State. And, just like the Gorge, other valuable land is included in the list to sell:

In North Carolina:

Forest Service maps show several tracts adjacent to the Needmore land in Swain County could be sold. The state owns 4,400 acres in the area and manages the land as game lands.

The Needmore tracts were bought in 2004 after a major public-private campaign to preserve the property. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service put up $2 million toward the purchase.

Hm. So this worthless land that is to be auctioned off also includes land that was previously purchased for conservation?

If the U.S. Forest Service begins selling off public lands, the agency won’t have any trouble finding buyers for land in Western North Carolina.

“I know there would be massive interest in larger tracts due to the fact there aren’t any large tracts of land left in Macon County,” said Robin Parker, owner of Cat Creek Realty in Franklin.

That’s right. Large tracts of open space are a rarity in more and more of the country. Their “value” is precisely because they are undeveloped, and they should be kept as such.

In Colorado:

The U.S. Forest Service has listed scenic land overlooking Rocky Mountain National Park and land around St. Mary’s Glacier as sites that could be sold to raise money for rural schools in 41 states.

In Missouri:

The Missouri land that might be sold is part of a once-depleted forest that public financing and decades of management have nurtured back to health.

Yes, after the public has paid for its reforestation, it’s time to sell!

Cedar Creek District Forester Carol Trokey said the land was mostly wooded, but some parcels have old fields with cedar trees. She said the parcels would be most useful for recreation or hunting.

Wait? The land would be useful for recreation or hunting? I thought that there was no recreation value in these lands?

And even some of the most anti-environment GOPers seem to be coming out against this proposal:

“Public lands are an asset that needs to be managed and conserved,” said Sen. Larry Craig of Idaho.

I can’t believe I am saying it, but Larry Craig is right (at least about the conservation part).

UPDATE: ACTION ALERT. Takes 1 minute. Please take action by emailing the regional forester and, more importantly, your congressional delegation.

UPDATE 2: DONATE ALERT. Please take action above. But also consider making even a small contribution to the organizations that are fighting this battle. Sadly, the environment receives a fraction of total philanthropic donations. Please consider donating to Friends of the Columbia Gorge and, for the larger battle, to The Wilderness Society.


Related posts: Damascus voters ruin Damascus, Goodbye to the Adirondacks (and other forests), Christianity versus land use planning

8 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Gordie  |  February 21st, 2006 at 4:55 am

    Regarding your rallying cry, note that the administration figures it can make the money necessary to provide the county and O&C payments by disposing of just under 200,000 acres of the 300,000 acres that have been proposed for sale. If that’s the case, the Columbia River Gorge Land could easily be cut from the proposal…though I’d wager they’ll wait until folks had wasted lots of energy and attention on the high-profile areas, making it easier to sell the more rural lands.

    FYI, when it comes to forest purchases, the National Forest system has been growing by about 100,000 acres per year for the last several years via purchases and land swaps. Would they put $1 million in the budget for Gorge land purchases if they thought there was a reasonable chance of selling those nominated parcels?

  • 2. Jenni Simonis  |  February 21st, 2006 at 6:29 am

    I wrote up an item on this on Feb 11th when the announcement was made– I loved Oregon’s natural areas when I visited in ‘97 and ‘98 and they’re a big reason why I agreed to move here in the summer of 2000.

    I went through the listing from the federal government and ranked the states according to the amount of land to be sold– Oregon came out #8 at 10,581 acres. More than 90 acres of land in the Columbia River Gorge on Oregon’s side is proposed for sale, almost 640 acres of land in the Columbia River Gorge on Washington’s side, and more than 376 acres on Mt. Hood.

    We absolutely have to stop this.

    http://www.blogfororegon.com/2006/02/bush_administration_wants_to_sell_public_lands

  • 3. Shantu Shah  |  February 21st, 2006 at 9:31 pm

    What are our elected representatives doing to stop this land sale of Columbia Gorge National Scenic area? If the curernt representatives in congress do not give any guarrantee to stop this sale do not vote for them in primary.

    I as a progressive democratic candidate for the Representative in US Congress from Oregon First District, when elected will make it my top priority to reverse this sale if that happens before the general election. I guarrantee it. Friends of the Columbia Gorge are my friends since Gorge (nature) is like my God.

  • 4. Peter Bray  |  February 22nd, 2006 at 1:17 am

    Gordie: Proof that the FS has been growing by 100,000 per year? So says Rey. But most land swaps are pretty blatantly phony.

  • 5. Land Use Watch » Po&hellip  |  February 23rd, 2006 at 12:00 pm

    […] February 22nd, 2006 Background: In an obscene attempt to privatize our public lands, the Bush administration proposes to auction to the highest bidder “isolated” forestland to pay for rural schools. Hundreds of thousands of acres will be chopped out of Bitterroot National Forest, the Columbia Gorge, and many other national treasures. If this scheme is allowed to proceed, year after year, we can expect our public lands to be sold to make up for the Bush-created national deficit. […]

  • 6. Land Use Watch » La&hellip  |  March 1st, 2006 at 3:34 pm

    […] March 1st, 2006 Background: In an obscene attempt to privatize our public lands, the Bush administration proposes to auction to the highest bidder “isolated” forestland to pay for rural schools. Hundreds of thousands of acres will be chopped out of Bitterroot National Forest, the Columbia Gorge, and many other national treasures. If this scheme is allowed to proceed, year after year, we can expect our public lands to be sold to make up for the Bush-created national deficit. […]

  • 7. Land Use Watch » Fo&hellip  |  March 2nd, 2006 at 3:27 pm

    […] March 2nd, 2006 Background: In an obscene attempt to privatize our public lands, the Bush administration proposes to auction to the highest bidder “isolated” forestland to pay for rural schools. Hundreds of thousands of acres will be chopped out of Bitterroot National Forest, the Columbia Gorge, and many other national treasures. If this scheme is allowed to proceed, year after year, we can expect our public lands to be sold to make up for the Bush-created national deficit. […]

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Required (to fight spam)

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed



Try Angie's List!


Outdoor Kids Gear


Nitro-Pak Preparedness Center

About Land Use Watch

Commentary and hyperbole on land use issues impacting the NW, the US, the world... Contact at peter (at) landusewatch.com ... Please email postal address to inquire about receiving Land Use Watch in monthly hard-copy periodical format.

Recent Comments

Stephanie: The argument that killing all cats to stop predatory behaviour on native creatures should then justify the killing of native predators is pure crap. The native animals are part of the natural cycle; cats are introduced by people. Like blackberries, and scotch bloom and English ivy, and starlings they are an invasive species that are driving out natives. Feeding and promoting feral cat populations should be a crime. They carry diseases like roundworm, heartworm, and hookworm, various forms of FIV and feline leukemia, distemper, and all manner of other sicknesses that cost responsible pet owners thousands of dollars to treat...
-- 2:59 pm, June 20, 2008 in Free James Stevenson

Lucas Stahl: Being an american citizen and knowing Donald Trumps past, the public of Aberdeen have to make it their scottish duty to keep Trump away from their lands. He has a way of taking everything from you and giving little in return. Your town will become the \"Las Vegas\" of Scotland with thousands of disrespectful tourists deficating over your lands and family. I know you think it will create jobs for your town and boost the economy but there are other means to do this; not through an ignorant; greed riddled man who makes a habit of stomping his feet, throwing out his chest and holding his breath like a child...
-- 10:07 am, June 11, 2008 in Aberdeen, Scotland: Let's Dump Trump

victoria davidson: I am a first generation American whos family are from the UK. I strongly disagree with the "Trump" philosophy in America. Mr. Trump's buliding along the Chicago River is an architectural monstroisity. Yet it is wrong to assume all Americans are "narcissictic & greedy". One of the reasons I love my UK visits is because of the timeless natural beauty along the coastlines not tainted with resorts and casinos. I applaud your efforts to block the building of this environmental disaster and hope you succeed. Perhaps Mr. Trump can find another venu to honour his Mother's memory.
-- 10:07 am, June 11, 2008 in Aberdeen, Scotland: Let's Dump Trump

Antoinette Harrington: I am an American, sick to death of "the donald" and his belief that his wealth entitles him to buy and destroy any piece of land on the globe. My dislike for him is indeed emotional, having seen how he destroyed the beauty of the Chicago River landscape with his Trump monstrosity. I hope and pray you will continue fighting till the last to prevent this man from achieving his goal. He will claim his plan is environmentally sound, and his witnesses will agree (though knowing the political climate, their agreement carries a price tag). Unlike Trump, I cannot afford to enjoy the beauty of your...
-- 11:02 am, June 10, 2008 in Aberdeen, Scotland: Let's Dump Trump

jj: Um, yeah, Most of that is BS. Get your facts right. Biofuels release carbon emissions, yes, but in carbon DIOXIDE. That's what the plants eat. It doesn't matter how much fuel the plant makes from sunlight, because we are fermenting it anyways. Soybean oil and biodiesel contain no sulfur and generate no sulfur emissions, a major source of acidification in rain and surface water. This makes biodiesel the best technology currently available for heavy-duty diesel applications to reduce atmospheric carbon. So basically, the best we have for right now. Oh, yeah, and about the hunger stuff, I have a solution: DON"T USE FOOD CROPS! Use...
-- 10:12 am, June 9, 2008 in Biofuels = stupid idea

Muscle Guitar: I agree with the author.Don't report a feral cat colony to a humane society or rescue group.I have a neighbor who feeds feral cats and they became a real problem.They don't act like house cats.They are constantly stalking prey like birds,squirrels and small rabbits.The tom cats are relentless sprayers. I mentioned this to my neighbor,and she acted as if it were none of my business that the cats were damaging my property. Better to report the colony to Animal Control,then if the cats are coming on your property let them trap them.Find a discreet place where the neighbors can't see the trap,bait the traps...
-- 7:48 pm, June 8, 2008 in Feral cats = huge environmental problem!

Emma: NO ONE SHOULD KILL ANIMALS! EVEN FERAL CATS! IT'S EVIL! I know I it might be "killing widlife" and "spreading disease", but NO ONE should kill kitties!
-- 10:10 am, June 3, 2008 in Feral cats destroying Iowa

Louie: I'm from Hong Kong, China. Just read the newspaper (it's in Chinese) that the breeding program has begun. What's more? There're two male specimens left in Vietnam. Don't know if they'll transport these two males to China and let them breed with the only female. If it happens, it's a good news that it could extend the diversity of this species' gene pool.
-- 7:24 pm, June 1, 2008 in Two Yangtze giant soft-shell turtles left... will China do anything?

Saki: Do the math. Either way, killing a cat or neutering a cat means one less cat that can reproduce, meaning the feral population will go down and eventually die out. The big question is do you want to behave like a psychopath in the making and kill innocent cats, or do you want to show that you really are smarter than other animals and get the cats neutered so they can live out the rest of their lives naturally? Before you answer that question, THINK; don\'t just react. Rednecks can be smart too. Proove that you\'re not a stereotype.
-- 8:39 pm, May 28, 2008 in Feral cats = huge environmental problem!

dhtuisgjkzdfghjksd: the lng is gay
-- 11:01 am, May 28, 2008 in LNG and the Columbia: bad news

dallas: that is totaly right. i have to tright a paper on them and this cite rocks.
-- 12:57 pm, May 27, 2008 in Ocelots in Texas!?

john: Doesn't matter what Hunnicutt thinks -- only what the rest of the country thinks: M37 sucks. "After two years of assessing Measure 37’s effect on Oregon, almost all of 2006 takings measures were resoundingly defeated by voters." http://www.napavalleyregister. com/articles/2008/05/21/opinio n/matt_pope/doc4834a07c082c645 6760426.txt
-- 7:32 am, May 23, 2008 in Dave Hunnicutt admits Measure 37 went too far?

Kyanna: hhmm.
-- 9:22 am, May 20, 2008 in Two Yangtze giant soft-shell turtles left... will China do anything?

Kyanna: i love cats and love the wildlife and i love EVERYTHING!!
-- 9:19 am, May 20, 2008 in Two Yangtze giant soft-shell turtles left... will China do anything?

CarpCoyote: There are two relationships in nature..predator and prey..if you wiped out every cat because you think they are responsible for killing all the birds, you should also kill humans, dogs, owls, and hawks. Of course, that would be absurd. If you are a real birder and not one who belongs to a club or society, you’ll know that the cat hysteria, like bionativism, is a psychological, not an ecological problem. It is easy and lazy to transfer blame to cats, who are amazing little creatures, are part of the food chain, and keep rodent populations in check. Killing them to “protect” birds is anti-nature and unfortunately, shows...
-- 7:03 am, May 19, 2008 in Free James Stevenson

Tag Cloud

measure 49 oregon measure 37 pessimism oregonians in action endangered species washington private property I 933 optimism media california elections 1000 friends sprawl feral cats consumerism rivers logging land auction china LNG portland parks energy england gorge florida africa proposition 90 gop canada wetlands transportation stupid religion politicians ocean india farms towns texas scotland nonprofits nevada missouri metro maine louisiana japan Idaho iceland gordon smith forests fish colorado climate brazil australia amazon wyoming utah salmon ross day Proposition 207 population pollution osu new york military measure 48 maryland kansas ireland invasive species hunting guyana georgia france Ecuador economics desert cuba connecticut community chile cambodia burma borneo big look Arizona alaska alabama

Posts by Date

February 2006
M T W T F S S
« Jan   Mar »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728  

Posts by Month

Blogroll

Land Use Advocacy

Tools

Feeds