<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Paul McKean, Amy Donohue, and the second house fetish</title>
	<link>http://www.landusewatch.com/2007/11/09/the-fetishism-of-the-second-home/</link>
	<description>News  and commentary on land (ab)use ...</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 19:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://www.landusewatch.com/2007/11/09/the-fetishism-of-the-second-home/#comment-30706</link>
		<author>Terry</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 20:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.landusewatch.com/2007/11/09/the-fetishism-of-the-second-home/#comment-30706</guid>
					<description>I heard on NPR that if all the world consumed as much as an environmentally green family o four outside of Los Angeles --a real family that lives in a 1000 sq, ft, house and hardly drives at all -- it would take &lt;b&gt;three earths&lt;/b&gt;  to sustain that rate of consumption.

 That 's something to think about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard on NPR that if all the world consumed as much as an environmentally green family o four outside of Los Angeles &#8211;a real family that lives in a 1000 sq, ft, house and hardly drives at all &#8212; it would take <b>three earths</b>  to sustain that rate of consumption.</p>
<p> That &#8217;s something to think about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://www.landusewatch.com/2007/11/09/the-fetishism-of-the-second-home/#comment-30708</link>
		<author>Terry</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 20:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.landusewatch.com/2007/11/09/the-fetishism-of-the-second-home/#comment-30708</guid>
					<description>That should read family "of" four.  

Good post, by the way, Peter.  Americans are definitely driven to excessive consumption.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That should read family &#8220;of&#8221; four.  </p>
<p>Good post, by the way, Peter.  Americans are definitely driven to excessive consumption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M</title>
		<link>http://www.landusewatch.com/2007/11/09/the-fetishism-of-the-second-home/#comment-30834</link>
		<author>M</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 05:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.landusewatch.com/2007/11/09/the-fetishism-of-the-second-home/#comment-30834</guid>
					<description>Take it up with your planning deptmnt....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take it up with your planning deptmnt&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.landusewatch.com/2007/11/09/the-fetishism-of-the-second-home/#comment-31316</link>
		<author>Pat Martin</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 16:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.landusewatch.com/2007/11/09/the-fetishism-of-the-second-home/#comment-31316</guid>
					<description>Hey, turns out they rent this house out to other weary yuppies looking for some rest and relaxation:

http://www.vrbo.com/132726

So does all vacation rental property come under the same condemnation that private 2nd homes get? What about hotels and motels in tourist destinations?

Pat Martin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, turns out they rent this house out to other weary yuppies looking for some rest and relaxation:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.vrbo.com/132726" rel="nofollow">http://www.vrbo.com/132726</a></p>
<p>So does all vacation rental property come under the same condemnation that private 2nd homes get? What about hotels and motels in tourist destinations?</p>
<p>Pat Martin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
