Glaceau “Smartwater” and the war on water

December 10th, 2007

So, it seems as though the ubiquitous “smartwater” is waging a war on regular water. Indeed, I got a copy of some crappy magazine called “Movies Rock!” with last weeks The New Yorker. The magazine is stuffed with advertisements, and a few terrible articles about music and movies.

The advertisement on the back of the magazine, and another inside, featured dull Jennifer Aniston for “smartwater”. The copy on the first reads:

What do you drink for purity? It’s dirty out there. Smartwater makes water the way nature used to, but in a totally pure environment. 100% pure water.

What an incredibly snide little snippet from their copywriters. And, of course, they conveniently leave out the fact that in their “making water” process (they must have some groundbreaking process of merging atoms to create totally new water) they use tons of energy, petroleum (for the plastics and transportation), and water itself!

Inside the magazine, a perhaps even more obnoxious little paragraph:

What do you drink for taste? The the swimming pool stuff. Or the tap. Or even the stuff from the ground. This water is pristine. Was never swum in or fell through the sky near the airport. It tastes the way nature intended. Clean. How smart is that?

Pristine? Ah, yes, but with lots of damage to the environment and everything else to make it pristine.

What’s the point in attacking “tap water” (and doesn’t THEIR water actually come from the tap, but then is purified via reverse osmosis or some crap??), especially when the tides are turning against such foolish consumption as bottled water.

The fact of the matter is that bottled water is hugely wasteful, in terms of energy, pollution, oil, disposal, and more. Now, it would be one thing if we didn’t have access to clean water. But 99% of the people reading this site probably do… and it is simply outrageous that a company starts attacking the viability of our local sources of water to help sell it’s product. (I have heard lots about this on NPR and other sources, but couldn’t find a good link to document the problems with bottled water… can anyone help?)

So, if you MUST drink bottled water, won’t you please consider NOT buying “smartwater”?


Related posts: Reasons I hate the New York Times, Plastic bags = not that bad, Biofuels = stupid idea

10 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Matt  |  December 11th, 2007 at 11:06 pm

    Got it. No Smart Water. But you should boycott The New Yorker. Talk about wasteful… I’ve been a subscriber in the past, and I can tell you, a lot of that paper is going to waste.

  • 2. DeveloperZero  |  December 12th, 2007 at 12:33 am

    While I agree with your attack on the “Smartwater” campaign (and any of those fecicious, bullshit claims on water, especially all the so-called “spring water” or the evian type things), I’d have to disagree with your general attack on all bottled water as bad. While general consumption by most people of bottled water is unneccessary, there are cases where the drinking of bottled water is not just good, but necessary.
    Case 1) Katrina (or any other natural disaster). Most of the drinking water was contaminated, and the choices then are either bottled water, or no water.
    Case 2)”Third World” countries(I know this doesn’t directly apply, since this is mostly a rant on American consumption of water) Much of the water is not fit for consumption, and there aren’t exactly massive water treatment plants everywhere (although bottled water probably isn\’t the BEST solution, it can be useful).
    Case 3) Hard water. I personally live in an area without hard water, and when I traveled across country a few years ago, I got sick within days because of drinking tap water. We had to buy a whole case of water just so I had something to drink on the trip. There are people like me who have medical conditions (I have an intestinal disorder that is NOT pretty), who either drink filtered water (such as bottled water) or no water at all. Mosty places in the United States don’t have the same standards for so-called “tap” water, so it isn’t exactly accurate to lump all “tap” water in together (that applies both to you and the bottled water corporations).

  • 3. Slate  |  February 16th, 2008 at 9:11 am

    You is paying you the OIL Companies, you lie to much get a real job

  • 4. angela  |  February 20th, 2008 at 10:17 am

    The tap water in Savananh GA where I spent my childhood is high in chemicals and the people there have been told to drink bottled water if they are kids, very old, have kidney problems, or other health concerns. Not to mention that is smells like fish.
    All tap water is not safe for drinking, even here in Sanford NC, a couple of years ago the same problem with the water was announced, to much chemical treatment.
    Another good reason to drink bottled water, vitamin and or electrolites. Alot of us are on the go and don’t have time to eat as healthy as we should. Now that we have the choice of vitamin and or electrolite water this may help. And let’s face it, bottled water even the plain one is better than soda.

  • 5. if you only knew  |  March 10th, 2008 at 12:27 pm

    If you knew what was in tap water or what was in spring water, you would be appalled. Vapor distilled and then re-mineralized water is a fantastic thing. Tap water contains traces of prescription drugs, chlorine, and the mother of em’ all fluoride, which is essentially chemical waste, if you know anything about chemistry.

    As far as the negatives of bottled water, all the negative studies speak of bottled water that has is missing the electrolytes that are placed back into smart water.

  • 6. Biffton  |  March 10th, 2008 at 2:07 pm

    Seems like Glaceu wins this argument.. Tap water is garbage, they just found drugs in it.

    http://www.cnn.com/2008/HEALTH/03/10/pharma.water1.ap/?iref=hpmostpop

  • 7. Lynda  |  March 10th, 2008 at 2:24 pm

    They\’re snide but you make comments against bottled water. Our water supply is already polluted. Most water in most countries is not good enough to drink from tap. Are you kidding me? Is someone a little sheltered? I live in Southern California and you can see the crap floating around in our tap water. I ran out of bottled water one time and made tea and refilled my aquarium with tap. Aside from the floating particles it made me sick to my stomach and killed my fish. And this is NOT a third world country. Try to imagine what the water is like in less developed places.

  • 8. Amanda  |  April 15th, 2008 at 12:28 am

    A little late in the comments I see. But I felt the need to contribute. I am 8 weeks away from graduating with a BS in Civil Engineering with a concentration in water resources and I can vouch for how poor most bottled water is. Smart Water tested one place out of many, and of course they report only one, they want more people to buy their products. Most bottled water is tap water. For all of you living in imagination land, check their sites. Most bottles or websites say “FPS” meaning from public source. The regulations a chemical limits on tap water are much more harsh and regulated then some bottled water. If you’re curious about your city’s water quality, you have the right to contact your city and ask for the test results that are taken on a regular basis. If you’re still worried, buy a brita and let the water sit for 24 hours to get rid of the chlorine. As for the flouride, dentists are actually worried that children will get more cavities now that they are drinking less tap water. The levels of flouride are minimal and not harmful. So for all those who are trying to be healthy and drink safe water, most of you are better off with the tap. An article you may want to look at, about how much energy and water is wasted from bottled water, as well as its quality: http://www.rd.com/special-reports/the-environment/rethink-what-you-drink/article51807.html

  • 9. MS  |  May 16th, 2008 at 4:28 am

    I live in a rural area where there is no water treatment available, so we have a well which is incredibly high in sulfur and other nasty elements. It is filtered enough for bathing, however our only choice for drinking water has been to purchase bottled water for 20 years.

    As for SmartWater, I discovered this about a year ago and have to admit it definitely seems superior to other brands I have purchased. I always attempted to stay away from any that were just jugs of tap water, as they always have some plasticy taste and dubious purity. We started to used a Pur filter even with ‘purified’ water just to be on the safe side. I have many stomach issues which drinking too much water encourages, however the SmartWater seemed to put an end to it. I suppose I needed just that little bit of electrolytes to do the trick. And the taste is brilliant. I dont think I ever noticed water to ‘taste’ as good as it. So, Im definitely sold for now unless someone can obviously prove that SmartWater is detrimental.

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Required (to fight spam)

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed



Try Angie's List!


Outdoor Kids Gear


Nitro-Pak Preparedness Center

About Land Use Watch

Commentary and hyperbole on land use issues impacting the NW, the US, the world... Contact at peter (at) landusewatch.com ... Please email postal address to inquire about receiving Land Use Watch in monthly hard-copy periodical format.

Recent Comments

micheelgeorge: When Plum Creek Timber Company bought 900,000 acres – 1,400 square miles – of Maine woods in 1998, it bought more than trees. It bought mountains along the Appalachian Trail, tens of wild trout ponds, miles of land flanking the Kennebec and Moose rivers and over 60 miles of shoreline along Moosehead Lake. -------------- micheel Utah Drug Addiction
-- 7:38 am, August 25, 2008 in Plum Creek Timber Company versus Moosehead Maine?

Kitty Clasing: I am looking for the closest trap, neuter and release program in Mason City, Iowa-50401
-- 8:45 am, August 5, 2008 in Trap, neuter, release and the Iowa cats

Stephanie: The argument that killing all cats to stop predatory behaviour on native creatures should then justify the killing of native predators is pure crap. The native animals are part of the natural cycle; cats are introduced by people. Like blackberries, and scotch bloom and English ivy, and starlings they are an invasive species that are driving out natives. Feeding and promoting feral cat populations should be a crime. They carry diseases like roundworm, heartworm, and hookworm, various forms of FIV and feline leukemia, distemper, and all manner of other sicknesses that cost responsible pet owners thousands of dollars to treat...
-- 2:59 pm, June 20, 2008 in Free James Stevenson

Lucas Stahl: Being an american citizen and knowing Donald Trumps past, the public of Aberdeen have to make it their scottish duty to keep Trump away from their lands. He has a way of taking everything from you and giving little in return. Your town will become the \"Las Vegas\" of Scotland with thousands of disrespectful tourists deficating over your lands and family. I know you think it will create jobs for your town and boost the economy but there are other means to do this; not through an ignorant; greed riddled man who makes a habit of stomping his feet, throwing out his chest and holding his breath like a child...
-- 10:07 am, June 11, 2008 in Aberdeen, Scotland: Let's Dump Trump

victoria davidson: I am a first generation American whos family are from the UK. I strongly disagree with the "Trump" philosophy in America. Mr. Trump's buliding along the Chicago River is an architectural monstroisity. Yet it is wrong to assume all Americans are "narcissictic & greedy". One of the reasons I love my UK visits is because of the timeless natural beauty along the coastlines not tainted with resorts and casinos. I applaud your efforts to block the building of this environmental disaster and hope you succeed. Perhaps Mr. Trump can find another venu to honour his Mother's memory.
-- 10:07 am, June 11, 2008 in Aberdeen, Scotland: Let's Dump Trump

Antoinette Harrington: I am an American, sick to death of "the donald" and his belief that his wealth entitles him to buy and destroy any piece of land on the globe. My dislike for him is indeed emotional, having seen how he destroyed the beauty of the Chicago River landscape with his Trump monstrosity. I hope and pray you will continue fighting till the last to prevent this man from achieving his goal. He will claim his plan is environmentally sound, and his witnesses will agree (though knowing the political climate, their agreement carries a price tag). Unlike Trump, I cannot afford to enjoy the beauty of your...
-- 11:02 am, June 10, 2008 in Aberdeen, Scotland: Let's Dump Trump

jj: Um, yeah, Most of that is BS. Get your facts right. Biofuels release carbon emissions, yes, but in carbon DIOXIDE. That's what the plants eat. It doesn't matter how much fuel the plant makes from sunlight, because we are fermenting it anyways. Soybean oil and biodiesel contain no sulfur and generate no sulfur emissions, a major source of acidification in rain and surface water. This makes biodiesel the best technology currently available for heavy-duty diesel applications to reduce atmospheric carbon. So basically, the best we have for right now. Oh, yeah, and about the hunger stuff, I have a solution: DON"T USE FOOD CROPS! Use...
-- 10:12 am, June 9, 2008 in Biofuels = stupid idea

Muscle Guitar: I agree with the author.Don't report a feral cat colony to a humane society or rescue group.I have a neighbor who feeds feral cats and they became a real problem.They don't act like house cats.They are constantly stalking prey like birds,squirrels and small rabbits.The tom cats are relentless sprayers. I mentioned this to my neighbor,and she acted as if it were none of my business that the cats were damaging my property. Better to report the colony to Animal Control,then if the cats are coming on your property let them trap them.Find a discreet place where the neighbors can't see the trap,bait the traps...
-- 7:48 pm, June 8, 2008 in Feral cats = huge environmental problem!

Emma: NO ONE SHOULD KILL ANIMALS! EVEN FERAL CATS! IT'S EVIL! I know I it might be "killing widlife" and "spreading disease", but NO ONE should kill kitties!
-- 10:10 am, June 3, 2008 in Feral cats destroying Iowa

Louie: I'm from Hong Kong, China. Just read the newspaper (it's in Chinese) that the breeding program has begun. What's more? There're two male specimens left in Vietnam. Don't know if they'll transport these two males to China and let them breed with the only female. If it happens, it's a good news that it could extend the diversity of this species' gene pool.
-- 7:24 pm, June 1, 2008 in Two Yangtze giant soft-shell turtles left... will China do anything?

Saki: Do the math. Either way, killing a cat or neutering a cat means one less cat that can reproduce, meaning the feral population will go down and eventually die out. The big question is do you want to behave like a psychopath in the making and kill innocent cats, or do you want to show that you really are smarter than other animals and get the cats neutered so they can live out the rest of their lives naturally? Before you answer that question, THINK; don\'t just react. Rednecks can be smart too. Proove that you\'re not a stereotype.
-- 8:39 pm, May 28, 2008 in Feral cats = huge environmental problem!

dhtuisgjkzdfghjksd: the lng is gay
-- 11:01 am, May 28, 2008 in LNG and the Columbia: bad news

dallas: that is totaly right. i have to tright a paper on them and this cite rocks.
-- 12:57 pm, May 27, 2008 in Ocelots in Texas!?

john: Doesn't matter what Hunnicutt thinks -- only what the rest of the country thinks: M37 sucks. "After two years of assessing Measure 37’s effect on Oregon, almost all of 2006 takings measures were resoundingly defeated by voters." http://www.napavalleyregister. com/articles/2008/05/21/opinio n/matt_pope/doc4834a07c082c645 6760426.txt
-- 7:32 am, May 23, 2008 in Dave Hunnicutt admits Measure 37 went too far?

Kyanna: i love cats and love the wildlife and i love EVERYTHING!!
-- 9:19 am, May 20, 2008 in Two Yangtze giant soft-shell turtles left... will China do anything?

Tag Cloud

measure 49 oregon measure 37 pessimism oregonians in action endangered species washington private property I 933 optimism media california elections 1000 friends sprawl feral cats consumerism rivers logging land auction china LNG portland parks energy england gorge florida africa proposition 90 gop canada wetlands transportation stupid religion politicians ocean india farms towns texas scotland nonprofits nevada missouri metro maine louisiana japan Idaho iceland gordon smith forests fish colorado climate brazil australia amazon wyoming utah salmon ross day Proposition 207 population pollution osu new york military measure 48 maryland kansas ireland invasive species hunting guyana georgia france Ecuador economics desert cuba connecticut community chile cambodia burma borneo big look Arizona alaska alabama

Posts by Date

December 2007
M T W T F S S
« Nov   Jan »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Posts by Month

Blogroll

Land Use Advocacy

Tools

Feeds