» Walk Score: neat application

Walk Score: neat application

March 9th, 2008

We help homebuyers, renters, and real estate agents find houses and apartments in great neighborhoods. Walk Score shows you a map of what’s nearby and calculates a Walk Score for any property. Buying a house in a walkable neighborhood is good for your health and good for the environment.

Tags: community

Related posts: No Related Posts

7 Comments Add your own

1. Robert Storm | March 9th, 2008 at 10:41 pm

Our adress recievied a 0 out of 100 score.
It appears to me that a 0 is the best score possible.
On our farm in southern Marion County, we grow our own food, cut our own hay, generate our own electricity, run a family farm, and help train others.
If not living amongst the masses is the negitive that gives us a 0 score; we win!
We don’t want to walk to bars, casinos, whorehouses, yuppie coffee dives etc..
Thank heavens for measure 49.
I hope my place never scores above 0.
2. Peter Bray | March 9th, 2008 at 11:01 pm

Hehe, good point!
3. Jim Labbe | March 10th, 2008 at 8:10 am

Ah but Robert and Peter. The futures of rural and urban Oregon are far more interdependent that you seem to appreciate. Walkable communities are by definition more dense and- if designed to effectively integrate the built and natural environments- more livable. So while Robert may choose to live in his rural escape, the future of rural Oregon depends very much on creating walkable livable urban communities where most people will desire to live, rather than all escaping to the country or some false approximation of the country (suburbia). To quote Mike Houck’s admonishment, “In livable cities in the preservation of the wild.”

Jim
4. Jim Labbe | March 10th, 2008 at 8:10 am

Actually it is “In livable cities is the preservation of the wild.”
5. Robert Storm | March 10th, 2008 at 9:36 pm

Ah but Jim…
All of those beutiful people in the idealistic walkable communities need to eat food.
Ah but Jim…
All of those beutiful people in the idealistic walkable communities need building materials for their houses.
Ah but Jim…
All of those beutiful people in the idealistic walkable communities need aggregate for their roads, concrete, and WALKWAYS.
Ah but Jim… Get real!
6. Jim Labbe | March 11th, 2008 at 12:17 am

Alright Robert. Here’s the deal. Let us both cease with the condescending “ah but” refrain (okay I admit, I started it). Lets also dispense with the holier-than-thou notion that rural or urban Oregonians are necessarily more self-reliant (or necessarily more anything) than the other. I have lived in rural and urban Oregon and the actual cultural differences are far less than some people would like to portray.

I wouldn’t dispute for a moment that any Oregonian (rural or urban) needs food, materials and aggregate or that those raw materials originate in rural areas. So I am not sure what you want me to “get real” about.

In fact, this observation only highlights another way rural and urban areas are interdependent. Modern rural economies are dependent on urban markets. Yes, urbanites need resources and raw materials but ruralites need urbanites to need things because that\’s how ruralites make a living.

But my original point was about a different kind of urban/rural interdependence: that the quality of our urban communities affects our capacity to keep rural communities genuinely rural.

If we care about maintaining genuinely rural landscapes, we need to do more than contain urbanization and defeat M37. We need to make communities inside our urban growth boundaries livable places for “the masses.” That means making urban communities more human scale which in turn means making them more walkable. Certainly there is more to livability than walkability, but it is a darn good proxy which was the point of the sightline.org scoring system which you seemed so quickly to dismiss.

Jim

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

About Land Use Watch

Commentary and hyperbole on land use issues impacting the NW, the US, the world... Contact at peter (at) landusewatch.com ... Please email postal address to inquire about receiving Land Use Watch in monthly hard-copy periodical format.

Recent Comments

Stephanie: The argument that killing all cats to stop predatory behaviour on native creatures should then justify the killing of native predators is pure crap. The native animals are part of the natural cycle; cats are introduced by people. Like blackberries, and scotch bloom and English ivy, and starlings they are an invasive species that are driving out natives. Feeding and promoting feral cat populations should be a crime. They carry diseases like roundworm, heartworm, and hookworm, various forms of FIV and feline leukemia, distemper, and all manner of other sicknesses that cost responsible pet owners thousands of dollars to treat...
-- 2:59 pm, June 20, 2008 in Free James Stevenson

Lucas Stahl: Being an american citizen and knowing Donald Trumps past, the public of Aberdeen have to make it their scottish duty to keep Trump away from their lands. He has a way of taking everything from you and giving little in return. Your town will become the \"Las Vegas\" of Scotland with thousands of disrespectful tourists deficating over your lands and family. I know you think it will create jobs for your town and boost the economy but there are other means to do this; not through an ignorant; greed riddled man who makes a habit of stomping his feet, throwing out his chest and holding his breath like a child...
-- 10:07 am, June 11, 2008 in Aberdeen, Scotland: Let's Dump Trump

victoria davidson: I am a first generation American whos family are from the UK. I strongly disagree with the "Trump" philosophy in America. Mr. Trump's buliding along the Chicago River is an architectural monstroisity. Yet it is wrong to assume all Americans are "narcissictic & greedy". One of the reasons I love my UK visits is because of the timeless natural beauty along the coastlines not tainted with resorts and casinos. I applaud your efforts to block the building of this environmental disaster and hope you succeed. Perhaps Mr. Trump can find another venu to honour his Mother's memory.
-- 10:07 am, June 11, 2008 in Aberdeen, Scotland: Let's Dump Trump

Antoinette Harrington: I am an American, sick to death of "the donald" and his belief that his wealth entitles him to buy and destroy any piece of land on the globe. My dislike for him is indeed emotional, having seen how he destroyed the beauty of the Chicago River landscape with his Trump monstrosity. I hope and pray you will continue fighting till the last to prevent this man from achieving his goal. He will claim his plan is environmentally sound, and his witnesses will agree (though knowing the political climate, their agreement carries a price tag). Unlike Trump, I cannot afford to enjoy the beauty of your...
-- 11:02 am, June 10, 2008 in Aberdeen, Scotland: Let's Dump Trump

jj: Um, yeah, Most of that is BS. Get your facts right. Biofuels release carbon emissions, yes, but in carbon DIOXIDE. That's what the plants eat. It doesn't matter how much fuel the plant makes from sunlight, because we are fermenting it anyways. Soybean oil and biodiesel contain no sulfur and generate no sulfur emissions, a major source of acidification in rain and surface water. This makes biodiesel the best technology currently available for heavy-duty diesel applications to reduce atmospheric carbon. So basically, the best we have for right now. Oh, yeah, and about the hunger stuff, I have a solution: DON"T USE FOOD CROPS! Use...
-- 10:12 am, June 9, 2008 in Biofuels = stupid idea

Muscle Guitar: I agree with the author.Don't report a feral cat colony to a humane society or rescue group.I have a neighbor who feeds feral cats and they became a real problem.They don't act like house cats.They are constantly stalking prey like birds,squirrels and small rabbits.The tom cats are relentless sprayers. I mentioned this to my neighbor,and she acted as if it were none of my business that the cats were damaging my property. Better to report the colony to Animal Control,then if the cats are coming on your property let them trap them.Find a discreet place where the neighbors can't see the trap,bait the traps...
-- 7:48 pm, June 8, 2008 in Feral cats = huge environmental problem!

Emma: NO ONE SHOULD KILL ANIMALS! EVEN FERAL CATS! IT'S EVIL! I know I it might be "killing widlife" and "spreading disease", but NO ONE should kill kitties!
-- 10:10 am, June 3, 2008 in Feral cats destroying Iowa

Louie: I'm from Hong Kong, China. Just read the newspaper (it's in Chinese) that the breeding program has begun. What's more? There're two male specimens left in Vietnam. Don't know if they'll transport these two males to China and let them breed with the only female. If it happens, it's a good news that it could extend the diversity of this species' gene pool.
-- 7:24 pm, June 1, 2008 in Two Yangtze giant soft-shell turtles left... will China do anything?

Saki: Do the math. Either way, killing a cat or neutering a cat means one less cat that can reproduce, meaning the feral population will go down and eventually die out. The big question is do you want to behave like a psychopath in the making and kill innocent cats, or do you want to show that you really are smarter than other animals and get the cats neutered so they can live out the rest of their lives naturally? Before you answer that question, THINK; don\'t just react. Rednecks can be smart too. Proove that you\'re not a stereotype.
-- 8:39 pm, May 28, 2008 in Feral cats = huge environmental problem!

dhtuisgjkzdfghjksd: the lng is gay
-- 11:01 am, May 28, 2008 in LNG and the Columbia: bad news

dallas: that is totaly right. i have to tright a paper on them and this cite rocks.
-- 12:57 pm, May 27, 2008 in Ocelots in Texas!?

john: Doesn't matter what Hunnicutt thinks -- only what the rest of the country thinks: M37 sucks. "After two years of assessing Measure 37’s effect on Oregon, almost all of 2006 takings measures were resoundingly defeated by voters." http://www.napavalleyregister. com/articles/2008/05/21/opinio n/matt_pope/doc4834a07c082c645 6760426.txt
-- 7:32 am, May 23, 2008 in Dave Hunnicutt admits Measure 37 went too far?

Kyanna: hhmm.
-- 9:22 am, May 20, 2008 in Two Yangtze giant soft-shell turtles left... will China do anything?

Kyanna: i love cats and love the wildlife and i love EVERYTHING!!
-- 9:19 am, May 20, 2008 in Two Yangtze giant soft-shell turtles left... will China do anything?

CarpCoyote: There are two relationships in nature..predator and prey..if you wiped out every cat because you think they are responsible for killing all the birds, you should also kill humans, dogs, owls, and hawks. Of course, that would be absurd. If you are a real birder and not one who belongs to a club or society, you’ll know that the cat hysteria, like bionativism, is a psychological, not an ecological problem. It is easy and lazy to transfer blame to cats, who are amazing little creatures, are part of the food chain, and keep rodent populations in check. Killing them to “protect” birds is anti-nature and unfortunately, shows...
-- 7:03 am, May 19, 2008 in Free James Stevenson