Barack Obama is a centrist anti-ESA machine Dem, part 2

December 17th, 2008

I can’t be bothered to write anything. After all, the writing is on the wall. Here I was lobbying about 10 hours per day (really) against Mike Thompson. And what happens? That droning President-elect apparently nominates someone even WORSE! Oh for the heady days of Mike Thompson… wow, I can’t believe I am saying that! But he would have been far, far better than the capitulating fop that is Ken Salazar.

And who was doing anything during this time? Not the Sierra Club, with milquetoast Carl Pope, not the NRDC, with its hurdy-gurdy Larry David LAsters. They did NOTHING. NOTHING.

Obama has no passion of interest for the environment. He has said as much. For him it is all about “green energy”. And the only reason he talks about that is the same reason that the aforementioned losers like Sierra Club and NRDC talk about it… for votes (or dollars)! But Obama knows little, and cares less, about, say, red superimposition, about downlisting atlantic salmon, or predation of springers at Bonneville, or WOPR, etc etc. And so he appoints the lizard king, Ken Salazar, to be his point man. And how great is that? Given that Salazar supported Norton, Gonzalez, and has little apparent brain activity.

So… I’ve written enough. Here, look how people respond:

This sums it up nicely:

TUCSON — It appears likely President-elect Barack Obama and his controversial Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel will nominate conservative Senator Ken Salazar of Colorado to head the US Dept. of Interior.

Since no official announcement has yet been made, I urge Obama to make a better pick. Overall, I and other American conservationists who deal with Interior are disturbed, but mining, livestock, argibusiness and other industries who have dominated Interior for years are excited about Salazar, which should worry anyone concerned with the public-interest.

While Salazar has promoted a few decent environmental actions, his overall record is decidedly mixed, and is especially weak in the arenas most important to the next Secretary of the Interior: protecting scientific integrity, combating global warming, reforming energy development and protecting endangered species.

Salazar has voted against increased fuel efficiency standards for the US automobile fleet; voted to end protection for offshore oil drilling off of Florida’s coast; voted to allow the Army Corps of Engineers to ignore global warming impacts in their water development projects; voted against the repeal of tax breaks for ExxonMobil; voted to support subsidies the livestock industry and other users of public forest and BLM lands; threatened to sue the US Fish and Wildlife Service when its scientists determined the black-tailed prairie dog may be endangered; and fought efforts to increase protection for endangered species and the environment in the Farm Bill.

Some comments from Interior experts about Ken Salazar, with more coming out every hour:

From Reuters: Big oil executive ‘BP America Chairman and President Robert Malone… expressed approval for U.S. Senator Ken Salazar of Colorado, Obama’s nominee for secretary of the interior… Also, Malone called for access to the Outer Continental Shelf for energy exploration…’

From NPR: ‘The only ones pleased with the rumored pick were those in the agriculture and mining industries. During the campaign these folks, generally, were counted as supporters of Republican John McCain.’

“Salazar is the first name mentioned that we could support,” said Laura Skaer, executive director of the Northwest Mining Association.

“Of all the names mentioned, Salazar is the one we’re happiest with,” said Dan Keppen, head of the Family Farm Alliance. Note: Keppen was formerly the head of Klamath Water Users Association, the group that worked with the Bush administration to manipulate science and overturn salmon restoration efforts in the Klamath Basin (leading to the deaths of as many as 70,000 salmon before they could spawn in September of 2002). His current group was launched to be the lobby front for agribusiness interests that get Bureau of Reclamation water.

From the Arizona Daily Star: Patrick Bray of the (anti-conservation) Arizona Cattlemen’s Association on Salazar, “We feel that he understands the issues very well and that he would be a very viable candidate.”

Colorado wildlife biologist Dr. Nicole Rosmarino in Denver: “Ken Salazar does not bring the change we need at Interior. Salazar will not take strong stances on behalf of science and environmental protection and is not up to the task of undoing the enormous damage the Bush administration has done to public lands, endangered species, and the credibility of the Department of the Interior over the last 8 years.”

Also in the Star: Jon Marvel of the Idaho-based Western Watersheds Project says: Salazar “will completely undermine Obama’s message of change. He will not bring change to the public lands of the western United States.” He called the appointment “a travesty.”

Coloradan Rob Edward of WildEarth Guardians says: “President Elect Obama is set to stick it to wildlife and public lands in the West, by appointing Senator (and rancher) Ken Salazar to head the Department of the Interior.”

Arizonan Ron Kearns, a former wildlife biologist with the US Fish and Wildlife Service, an Interior Dept. agency, says: “As a 30-year Republican, I will regret having voted for Obama if this happens.”

Coloradan Phil Doe, who formerly worked with Interior agency Bureau of Reclamation says of Salazar: “He’s green washed himself of late with his stand on the BLM oil and gas leases, but he is at bottom the same cautious careerist he always has been, aimlessly testing each decision for its potential impact on his slow steady rise to the top of the pond.

“He is anathema to many Dems here, especially for his support of the the war, his avuncular embrace of the little torture maestro, (Alberto) Gonzalez.., and his insistence that he is the senator for rural America. The latter is code for big ranching and farming America, the same people who are rewarded lavishly every year with a bundle of goodies from Washington. It sure as hell doesn’t mean rural labor, among the poorest of the working poor. …he is outright disliked by activist Dems.

“One thing is for sure, he would make the traditional big farm and ranch interests happy. And it is probably from this group that his name surfaced. From my own vantage, I would make book that the O man’s promise of infrastructural restoration in the west would mean more dams and probably some irrigation at the public’s expense if Salazar could influence the nature of the expenditures, and why couldn’t he. He ain’t much, and there is a place reserved in hell for his kind, the parsers. The O man needs to toss the west a bone, and Salazar sure as hell isn’t it.”

Arizonan Kieran Suckling of the Center for Biological Diversity says: “The Department of the Interior desperately needs a strong, forward looking, reform-minded Secretary. Unfortunately, Ken Salazar is not that man. He endorsed George Bush’s selection of Gale Norton as Secretary of Interior, the very woman who initiated and encouraged the scandals that have rocked the Department of Interior. Virtually all of the misdeeds described in yesterday’s Inspector General expose occurred during the tenure of the person Ken Salazar advocated for the position he is now seeking.”

“Obama’s choices for Secretary of Energy and his Climate Change Czar indicate a determined willingness to take on global warming. That team will be weakened by the addition of Ken Salazar who has fought against federal action on global warming, against higher fuel efficiency standards, and for increased oil drilling and oil subsidies.”

Also from Suckling: ‘In addition to his misstep on Norton, Salazar endorsed the elevation of William Myers III to the federal bench. Myers was a former Interior Department Solicitor and lobbyist for the ranching industry. Senator Leahy called him ”the most anti-environmental candidate for the bench I have seen in 37 years in the Senate.” Bizarrely, Salazar praised Myers’ “outstanding legal reasoning” regarding endangered species, Indian affairs, federal lands and water, timber, and fish and wildlife issues. The American Bar Association rated Meyers as “not qualified.” Salazar later supported Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General, introducing him at his Senate confirmation hearing.’

“One of the most important jobs of the Secretary of the Interior is to help pick dozens of critically important political appointees to oversee America’s conservation system. His past misjudgments of Norton, Meyers and Gonzales give us little confidence he will choose wisely in the future,” says Suckling.

As an ecologist and supporter of Arizona Congressman Raul Grijalva as the best choice for Interior, at this time I don’t support Salazar, but I will give him a chance to change his ways if he is nominated and confirmed as Secretary.

If Obama nominates Salazar, add it to the questionable pick of Lisa Jackson for EPA for a somewhat shaky start for his energy and environmental agenda.

With all due respect Mr. Obama and transition team, these picks are not the most courageous, and are not ‘the change we need or can believe in’ on energy and the environment.




Try Angie's List!


Outdoor Kids Gear


Nitro-Pak Preparedness Center

About Land Use Watch

Commentary and hyperbole on land use issues impacting the NW, the US, the world... Contact at peter (at) landusewatch.com ... Please email postal address to inquire about receiving Land Use Watch in monthly hard-copy periodical format.

Recent Comments

DE: “From my point of view, they are the antichrist of the world.” —Ken Salazar, to a Colorado Springs television station in April 2006, about James Dobson’s Focus on the Family group. He later said, “I regret having used that term. I meant to say this approach was un-Christian, meaning self-serving and selfish.”
-- 1:08 pm, December 22, 2008 in Obama (and the Sierra Club) sucks, part 3

DE: “Earned a perfect-100 ranking in 2008 from the League of Conservation Voters, a nonpartisan organization that tracks environmental-voting records in Congress. His lifetime LCV score is an 81.” A 100 ranking from LCV. This is a massive improvement over Bush’s henchmen. You’ll never be happy.
-- 1:07 pm, December 22, 2008 in Obama just doesn’t get it

DE: This blog has become a depressing place to hang out. I enjoyed your coverage of M37-49, but it’s just angry hackery now. Maybe it will be more fun when Nader is elected in 2012 and you can celebrate his excellent appointments, but for now… Unsubscribed.
-- 1:03 pm, December 22, 2008 in Obama (and the Sierra Club) sucks, part 3

Zarathustra: Fremont County Veterinary Clinic in Sidney (the closest vet,) falsely identified as the clinic who would euthanize cats, issued a statement that they would in fact spay/neuter cats for Trap-Neuter-Return in an agreement with Fry‘s Country Bargains, a no-kill shelter in Creston. There are a lot in NE, if you want to go that far. Locally, beware of OHSU. They play loose with the regs and are not above paying people to round up cats, claim cats and dogs at the pound, etc., where they end up in OHSU labs. Hard to believe it can be hard to get that message out, here. I was shocked that saying that there...
-- 8:06 pm, December 18, 2008 in Trap, neuter, release and the Iowa cats

Zarathustra: Like it’s accidental? He gets it; it’s the Dems that voted for him that don’t get it! This was the wost from a third party POV in years.
-- 7:54 pm, December 18, 2008 in Obama just doesn’t get it

Zarathustra: Tomorrow’s my b-day. Hope it’s my last. No change; no hope! Hmmm, maybe a cunning plan to deal with health insurance; people not giving a damn if they live or die. Well, something to hope for. Bill Clinton doubled the Federal non-violent prison population. I’m predicting that BO will stink in the same way, only worse. Dems are suckers for that action and I stand to clean up when it does happen. Like I care about money. Yeah, back to no hope. Which is worse, to run as the face of evil and fulfill it, or run as hope and change and give us more of the same? I much prefer an open...
-- 7:51 pm, December 18, 2008 in Obama (and the Sierra Club) sucks, part 3

R: ***COMPLETELY OFF TOPIC*** Glad to see you’re back from your hiatus. I came to this site to post an obligatory comment about cats and birds, as my indoor cat is obsessed with birds this morning, but will refrain since you’ve posted new stuff. Keep fighting the good fight! :)
-- 9:10 am, December 15, 2008 in Raul Grijalva for Interior! (NO to Mike Thompson!)

johanna lynch: Mike Thompson is a bad joke here in Northern California. He is a good ‘ole wine boy! Anti-environmentalist and would be disastrous as Secretary of the Interior. Thompson would be as bad as it gets under the Reagan administration re environmental issues. Forestry, land use and wildlife would be brutalized. This man is a “trophy hunter” the worst kind of idiot-recreational hunters. An embarrassment for the US and a disgraceful example of disdain for nature, wildlife and diminishing natural resources
-- 10:24 am, December 14, 2008 in Raul Grijalva for Interior! (NO to Mike Thompson!)

SANDMAN: I don’t know, but when the Bush administration murdered 68,000 salmon on the lower Klamath river Thompson dumped 500 lbs of dead fish on the steps of BOR’s DC office building and demanded change. Last week parties announced an agreement in principle to remove the lower four Klamath dams - this would be the largest river resotration event in World History. Not bad pro-environmental credential if you ask me.
-- 12:06 pm, December 12, 2008 in Mike Thompson: Elephant hunter?

Peter: I’ve been through every vote he has made since 1991. When he votes for Bush’s “Healthy Forests Initiative”, against fish/widlife funding, against roadless areas in Tongass… and many times when he did such votes he was the ONLY California Democrat to do so (or one of only 30 Dems total to do so)… I can only conclude that he is anti-environment. Carl Pope might very well favor him versus a GOPer in that seat. Mike Thompson is a BAD choice for Interior. He hasn’t been a leader for the environment, save for dumping some fish and sponsoring a bill… he has simply...
-- 12:56 pm, December 11, 2008 in Is Klamath Riverkeeper anti-environment?

ed hochuli: You need to take it easy with the hyperventilating…” Bush-lite?” The guy won the Sierra Club’s Edgar Wayburn award last year. I went to a fundraiser of his in Santa Rosa and Carl Pope was there praising him over and over. Ask environmental groups in his district like klamath riverkeeper how he is on the environment. Anyone can pick through a few votes. Do your homework.
-- 10:43 am, December 11, 2008 in Is Klamath Riverkeeper anti-environment?

Peter: Thompson is hardly progressive. He is, after all, a member of the conservative Blue Dog democrats. And I’m not sure how many progressives get awards, such as Legislator of the Year, from pro-hunting outfits like Safari Club International (whose members hunt lions, rhinos, elephants, etc).
-- 7:24 pm, December 8, 2008 in Mike Thompson is anti-environment

John Mccarthy: Look, what were doing here is just having a useless argument between two well-suited democrats who would both do well in this position. I happen to know Mike personally, I happen to know that he just received an award this week from the Sierra Club because of his conservation efforts. Also, I don’t feel it necessary to instigate a battle with someone who does not think Obama is “progressive” enough, or someone who did not support Obama. Actually do some research, go on Thompson’s site, and you’ll find your results. And hey, I support Mike, but you support Grijalva, and power...
-- 6:47 pm, December 8, 2008 in Mike Thompson is anti-environment

Peter: You “could” do it? Well, go ahead and do so. If you don’t, then it is hardly evidence. Look at Thompson’s record. He is bought and owned by hunting interests and will do their bidding every time. Limits on roadless areas? Voted against it. Bush’s anti-environment policies, such as Healthy Forests? Supported them. Thompson may very well win. And that’s one of the main reasons I never supported Barack Obama. He is not a progressive.
-- 6:34 pm, December 8, 2008 in Mike Thompson is anti-environment

John Mccarthy: Mike Thompson happens to be a competent, capable person that I, and many others support to be Secretary of Interior. He has a long history of preserving the environment, which you have obviously failed to mention. Peter, I could do a long anti-environment blog against Grijalva, because I’m sure I could nitpick at all the bills he’s vetoed and passed, but I, unlike you, have better things to do with my time, as well as an actual sense of politics. There’s also a reason Obama has Thompson as the frontrunner, and not Grijalva. When Thompson is picked, I will be laughing at you and your...
-- 6:28 pm, December 8, 2008 in Mike Thompson is anti-environment

Posts by Date

December 2008
M T W T F S S
« May   Jan »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Posts by Month

  • Blogroll

  • Land Use Advocacy

  • Tools

  • Feeds